TOP LATEST FIVE LATEST PAKISTANI CASE LAW URBAN NEWS

Top latest Five latest pakistani case law Urban news

Top latest Five latest pakistani case law Urban news

Blog Article

33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives on the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, make certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

In that feeling, case legislation differs from just one jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in The big apple would not be decided using case regulation from California. Rather, The big apple courts will review the issue depending on binding precedent . If no previous decisions about the issue exist, Ny courts may well examine precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority relatively than binding authority. Other factors including how previous the decision is and the closeness to the facts will affect the authority of a specific case in common law.

The a good amount of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made distinct that police is free to just take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-subject duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this kind of an appeal has not nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may then request further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

While there is not any prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds minor sway. Still, if there is not any precedent in the home state, relevant case regulation from another state may very well be viewed as from the court.

PLR is actually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it truly is unclear how it applies to any specified situation, usually rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers and the circumstances of your case at hand. These types of decisions become a guide for foreseeable future similar cases.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It is usually a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.

This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to really make it correct into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief labour law case study pdf Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include things like all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are recognized by executive organizations based on statutes.

Report this page